Note that there is no intention to present this as a finished document. It's just a set of rough notes for a book that I will probably never write. Many of the internal links are defunct. Maybe I'll fix that someday. Maybe not. I have attempted to remove all copyrighted material except some "thumbnail" images that I believe qualify as "fair use" under this week's groundrules for handling "intellectual property".



The GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) is a copyleft license for open content, designed by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) for the GNU project.  The official text of version 1.1 of the license text can be found at http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html.  Here is Wikipedia's uneditable copy of Version 1.1 of the license <<-- this link is dead!!!!

this needs some more work before it constitutes a proper copy of the license.

The license is designed for software documentation and other reference and instructional materials. It stipulates that any copy of the material, even if modified, carry the same license. Those copies may be sold but, if produced in quantity, have to be made available in a format which facilitates further editing.

Secondary Sections

The license explicitly separates the "Document" from "Secondary Sections", which may not be integrated with the Document, but exist as front-matter materials or appendices. Secondary sections can contain information regarding the author's or publisher's relationship to the subject matter, but not any subject matter itself. While the Document itself is wholly editable, and is essentially covered by a license equivalent to the GNU GPL, some of the secondary sections have various restrictions designed primarily to deal with proper attribution to previous authors.

Specifically, the authors of prior versions have to be acknowledged and certain "invariant sections" specified by the original author and dealing with his or her relationship to the subject matter may not be changed.  If the material is modified, its title has to be changed (unless the prior authors give permission to retain the title). The license also has provisions for the handling of front-cover and back-cover texts of books, as well as for "History", "Acknowledgements", "Dedications" and "Endorsements" sections.

Using the GFDL

For a document to be covered by the GFDL, one must include a specific copyright and license notice.

Note about Wikipedia's use of the GNU Free Documentation License

All Wikipedia (and Nupedia) content is covered by the GNU Free Documentation License. The details necessary for proper licensing under the GFDL were discussed on Wikipedia-L in October 2001 (see also /Workshop).

Wikipedia and Nupedia's use of the GFDL began in January, 2001, and has won the project the support of Richard Stallman of the FSF.  See [1].  It has long been the understanding of Wikipedia principals (Jimbo Wales and Larry Sanger at least) that, as in the case of Nupedia (see [2] and [3]), links back to original Wikipedia articles would be required from anyone who used Wikipedia articles.  (Jimbo confirms that Stallman agreed that the license permits this. [4])  Wikipedia principals have, recently, finally gotten around to making this requirement explicit for Wikipedia (as it has been for Nupedia), which has caused some controversy. (See the Wikipedia-L archives and /Talk.)

One of the issues being discussed is the requirement (by Wikipedia principals Jimbo Wales and Larry M. Sanger in October 2001) that one use a HTML banner (back reference) on any page on another web site or CDROM on which Wikipedia content appears, or (also now strongly supported by Wikipedia principals) a text link. Please note the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) says that the license must be included in every copy of a document. This means that the back reference should at least include a link to the GFDL which is not the case yet in the Wales/Sanger proposal (or requirement as they like to put it).

Note that international copyright law (including the US law) states they cannot change the license without the written consent of the other authors. The principals are aware of this but they believe their requirement/proposal falls within the scope of the license.

Please see Wikipedia's license instructions page for details.  What exactly can and should be required is under active consideration, and the founders and managers of the Wikipedia project will be working together with all interested Wikipedians to arrive at a mutually agreeable solution on Wikipedia-L.





http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/LPSC98/pdf/1496.pdf

http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~hagadorn/Taph.pd

www.tu-berlin.de/fb9/palaeontologie/projekt.htm

http://www.grisda.org/origins/03066.htm Should be analysed carefully

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section3.html

There are a variety of creation legends \ most of them impressively complex. One example is the Nordic legend wherein there was a great void called Ginningagap in which Niflheim \ a region of fire and ice was formed in the North and Muspellsheim, a region of fire formed in the South. The great world-tree Yggdrasil and its opponent the evil serpent Nidhogg reached through all time and space. Under the a root of Yggdrasil lay the fountain of Mimir, the source of hidden wisdom. Eventually Nflheim came into contact with Muspellsheim and the fires melted the ice creating the Frost-Giant Ymir. Ymir's sweat yielded a race of Giants who lived on the milk of the giant cow Audhumla. The cow one day licked the ice and uncovered the Buri who begot a son Bur (from whom?). Bur, in turn fathered three sons, the Gods Odin, Vili and Ve. The three Gods murdered Ymir. They formed a great sea (in which the Giants drowed) from Ymir's blood. They created the solid land from Ymir's body. The Heavens were created from Ymir's skull. The dwarves were created from the maggots that fed on Ymir's body. The Gods then finished their work by creating the first man from an Ash tree and the first woman from a vine.

Primitive Creation Stories

http://www.dreamscape.com/morgana/ariel.htm







Galileo

Galilei Galileo was an Italian mathematician and astronomer. He was born in Pisa in 1564 and died in 1642. Galileo was a noted inventor, optician, mathematician and astronomer. He discovered the satellites of Jupiter. Galileo embraced the heliocentric universe model of Copernicus. 17th Century clerics disliked the heliocentric model because it was seen as a rejection of God as the creator of the Universe and mover of the heavenly bodies. Galileo was admonished a number of times by the church about his beliefs and his practice of writing books that advocated the heliocentric model. He was forced to publicly recant his views in 1633 and was placed in house imprisonment for the final 9 years of his life. Since he was in poor health for the final decade of his life, this was not as great a burden as it might seem.



Bruno

Giordano Bruno was a 16th Century Italian soldier, philosopher and (for a time) cleric. He was born in 1548 and was executed by the Inquisition in 1600. Bruno had a certain talent for annoying people and traveled to most of the countries of Western Europe making numerous friends and enemies everyplace he lived. Bruno was an outspoken advocate of the Copernican Heliocentric theory of the solar system. He envisioned a universe of many stars and Solar Systems created by God. Bruno and the establishment held widely divergant views on whether Bruno's world view showed sufficient respect for God. Bruno made his case in a number of books and lectures. The establishment made theirs by burning Bruno at the stake on February 17, 1600.

Copernicus

Nicolas Copernicus was a Pole born in 1473 and who died in 1543. He was a cleric and astronomer who worked almost 100 years before the invention of the telescope. His book "De Revolutionibus" published in 1530 hypothecated that the Earth was a sphere rotating on its axis once a day and traveling around the sun once a year \ The Heliocentric Theory of the universe. Copernicus had the good sense to die before the full impact of his ideas had been digested. Unfortunately for his immediate successors the Aristotelian -Ptolemic view of an Earth Centered universe had become religious dogma and the Aristotelian "Prime Mover" had become equated to God. Since the Copernican viewpoint obviated the need for a Prime Mover for the Celestial spheres, the Heliocentric model was not readily accepted by the Catholic Church. 100 years after Copernicus, Bruno and Galileo were burned at the stake and imprisoned for life respectively for espousing similar beliefs. "De Revolutionibus" was banned by the Catholic Church in the early 17th Century and remained banned for two centuries.



Isaac Newton



Isaac Newton was an English mathematician and philosopher. He was born in 1642 and died in 1727. Newton was the son of a farmer. He was sent to college when it became obvious that he had an aptitude for learning and little real interest in farming. Newton discovered/formulated several key elements of modern mathematics including the binomial theorum and Newton's method of solving differentials. He is best known for formulating the theory of Gravitation which explained the motion of planets with one attractive force whose affects could be predicted with one simple equation. He apparently thought initially that his theory of gravitation was an approximation of reality and was surprised to discover that the results were exact.

Newton did not care for Decartes vortex theory of solar origin and eventually demonstrated that it was not consistent with the laws of motion.

Newton was a brilliant optician who worked out the principles of color dispersion and the nature of the rainbow. Although he understood the nature of refraction, his attempts to devise a color correcting telescope lens were unsuccessful. He eventually invented the reflecting telescope that used a non-refracting mirror in place of the troublesome refracting lens.

Newton dealt with gravity and mathematics in the three volume Principia and published a separate book on Optics.



Kepler

Johannes Kepler was a German philosopher and astronomer. He was born in 1571 and died in 1640. He was raised as a Lutheran, but was later excommunicated because of his refusal to agree with the Lutheran church on theological issues. He refused to convert to Catholicism. He moved several times to places that did not demand that he adopt one or the other of the two religions. He succeeded Tycho Brae as the Imperial Mathematician in Prague.

Kepler was responsible for major advances in optics, mathematics, and astronomy. As an astronomer, he was an ardent advocate of the Copernican heliocentric theory. He developed three laws of motion that describe the motion planets:

Newton subsequently rationalized these laws in his theory of Gravitation. Kepler was also able to measure the rotation period of the sun and the distance of several stars. Kepler was the first astronomer to explain the relationship between the moon and tides.

Tycho Brahe

A Danish Astronomer and mathematician who made detailed observations of planetary positions. Brahe was born in 1546 and died in 1601. He lost part of his nose in a youthful duel and wore a distinctive metal plate. Brahe felt (correctly apparently) that progress in astronomy depended on improved instrumentation. Brahe spent many years improving instrumentation and building Europe's finest observatory. He eventually had a falling out with King Christian and moved to Prague where he hired Johannes Kepler as an assistant. His voluminous observations of the positions of Mars over time were the basis of Kepler's development of the laws of planetary motion. Curiously, although Brahe demonstrated that the prevailing geocentric model was unworkable by observing comets moving unimpeded through what should have been crystal spheres, he did not support the heliocentric model of Copernicus.

Aristotle

A 4th Century BC Greek philosopher who taught after Socrates and Plato. Aristotle was noted for his scientific approach to biology, and his failure to apply even the simplest tests to his quite incorrect notions of physics. Aristotle thought that the stars and planets were made up of a fifth element (Aether) over and above Earth, Air, Fire and Water. He proposed that the heavenly bodies were attached to 55 concentric rotating crystalline spheres. The outermost sphere was rotated by a "prime mover" The rest \ including a number of "buffer spheres" without celestial bodies attached were dragged along at varying rates. This model explained the general motion of the celestial objects, but failed to account for retrograde planetary motion and the varying of planetary brightness. Later modifications attached the planets to circular "epicycles" that were attached to the spheres and rotated constantly, thus accounting (roughly) for the variations in planetary motion and brightness.

Aristarchus

A third Century BC Greek philosopher/Astronomer who built upon the work of his contemorary Erasthones who showed the Earth to be a sphere roughly 8000 miles in diameter. Ariatarchus determined the size of the moon and made a rough guess at the size of the sun. He was apparently the first astronomer to propose that the Earth rotated around the sun and that the planets were bodies similar to the Earth also rotating around the sun. His ideas were less than enthusiastically received for a variety of reasons, some not entirely irrational and were subordinated to those of Aristotle and later Ptolemy. They were eventually revived by Copernicus nearly 2000 years later.

Ptolemy

Claudius Ptolemy was a "Greek" Philosopher and Astronomer from Alexandria in Egypt. He was born around 85AD and lived until about 165AD. He summed up conventional thought as to the nature of the universe based on the model of Aristotle. Ptolemy thought that the Earth was a sphere about 8000 miles in diameter. He believed that the heavens were a spherical shell surrounding the Earth and that the heavenly bodies were objects moving around on the inner surface of the shell on an elaborate system of wheels (epicycles) and wheels attached to wheels. Ptolemy set this forth in a book called "The Algemest" This view prevailed until the time of Copernicus.





T. C. Chamberlin

An early 20th Century astronomer who together with his contemporary F. R. Moulton hypothecated the Paletiesimal Theory of solar system creation. They hypothecated a near miss collision of the sun with another star. The close passage ripped material from the Sun (and star) that condensed into tiny planetesimals that then accreated into planets and moons by collision. This is somewhat similar to Buffon's cometary theory and is subject to some of the same criticisms. e.g. How did the stars get created?

Tidal Theory

A theory of planetary formation set forth by James Jeans and Harold Jeffreys in 1918. It was hypothecated that a passing star raised a huge tidal wave on the sun and that parts of the wave broke loose and subsequently condensed into the planets.

F. R. Moulton.

An early 20th Century astronomer who together with his contemporary T. C. Chamberlin hypothecated the Paletiesimal Theory of solar system creation. They hypothecated a near miss collision of the sun with another star. The close passage ripped material from the Sun (and star) that condensed into tiny planetesimals that then accreated into planets and moons by collision. This is somewhat similar to Buffon's cometary theory and is subject to some of the same criticisms. e.g. How did the stars get created?

Planetary Creation Models

Theories of how the world was created can be broken into four groups. In the beginning (as it were) there were creation theories of tribes and ancient societies. A well known example is the story of creation set forth in the Old Testament. There are many other generally much more elaborate stories. What they have in common is that they make little attempt to explain astronomical events, climate, the motion of the planets and similar phenomena. God (or Gods) created the world and the world is as it was created.

The second set of theories were developed by the Greeks who recognized that the Earth is a sphere and determined its size with reasonable precision. These Geocentric Theories placed the Earth at the center of the universe and placed the heavenly bodies on the inside of an encircling spherical shell. Several Greek astronomers \ especially Aristarchus \ went well beyond the Geocentric theory recognizing the sun and moon as spherical bodies also. But their ideas were considered to be eccentric and they were not in the mainstream of Greek astronomy as set forth by Aristotle in the fourth Century BC and Ptolomy in the second century AD.

Geocentric views prevailed until the 16th Century when European astronomers starting with Copernicus introduced a Sun centered model of the solar system. The heliocentric model was supported by Bruno, Galielo, and Kepler, despite the strong opposition of the Catholic Church which felt that Heliocentricism was a denial of God. Evidence piled up ending with Kepler's formulation of the laws of planetary motion and Newton's explanation of gravity. At that point, heliocentric models became dominant. Except for minor refinements made in the 20th Century to accommodate relativistic mechanics, Newton's work completed the task of describing the general nature of the solar system.

Shortly thereafter the issue became not what the solar system was, but how it was created. Newton's contemporary Descartes set forth the first creation theory that attempted to account for a solar system as we recognize it today with a number of planets rotating around a luminous ball of gas. Descartes' theory was the predecessor of what has come to be known as the Nebular Theory of planetary creation. In the succeeding four centuries, a number of theories of planetary creation have been suggested. The current favorite is a variant of the Nebular Theory that would have been recognizable in many respects to Descartes.

Planetary creation models date from Grecian times. Key figures include the Greek philosophers Aristotle, Erasthones, Ptolemy, and Aristarchus; Copernicus, Kepler, Newton, Descartes, Swedenborg. Kant, and a number of modern astronomers.

The Aristotilian/Ptolemic view of the universe placed the (spherical) Earth at the Center of a hollow celestial sphere (or multitude of such spheres) and moved the celestial bodies around the inner surface(s) of the sphere in circular epicycles. The first sun centered model was proposed the 3rd Century BC by Aristarchus, but it was largely ignored until the 16th Century when Copernicus proposed a similar theory. Galileo and Bruno advocated the heliocentric theory. Kepler's laws of motion and Newton's theory of gravitation explained the motions of the planets with a precision and elegance that earth centered models couldn't approach. None of these early theories really addressed the issue of how or why the Earth came to be. God(s) created it. Asking too many questions about how or why could \ and sometime did \ result in shunning, imprisonment, or death.

Modern theories of Earth origin date the realization in the 16th Century that the planets are comparatively large solid bodies orbiting around the sun. Once the Earth was identified as just another planet, it became reasonable to ask where planets came from. The problems that any planeteary creation model must explain include the fact that all the planets rotate in around the sun in the same direction and in roughly the plane of the sun's equator. They must explain why most of the solar system's mass is in the sun, but most ot the angular momentum has somehow found its way into the planets. Explaining the condensed gas bodies of comets and why they are not in the same sort of orbits as planets would be nice. In the very recent past, the problem of explaining extrasolar planetary systems \ many of them containing huge planets \ have been added

Excluding the legends of tribal societies such as those embedded in Genesis, the epoch of Gilgamesh, etc, the first serious theory was that of Aristotle who thought than stars and planets were made of a fifth element - Aether. Aristotle's theory is treated with some scepticism today. Erasthones recognized the Earth moon, and sun as celestial bodies. Aristarchus managed a fairly modern model of the known solar system, but did not attempt to explain its origins. Copernicus built upon the work of Aristarchus without giving him much credit. Kepler and Newton explained the motions of the planets. Newton's contemporary Descartes is credited with the first modern creation theory that attempted to explain the solar system in terms of our modern understanding of the solar system as a star surrounded by circling planets. Early (and current come to that) models center upon a nebular hypothesis set forth in 1655 by Rene Descartes and expanded on primarily by Immanual Kant. In later centuries, several encounter theories were proposed that tried to explain planets as the result of the passage of a star near the sun or collision between the sun and some large object. These were never entirely satisfactory and have become less so with the recent discovery of planets circling nearby stars. An early 20th Century variant of the nebular theory was the planetesimal theory. The nebular theory was ressurected by Weiszacker and Kuiper in the mid 20th Century and is the generally accepted model today.

Georges Buffon

Georges Louis Leclerc de Buffon was a well known 18th Century naturalist. In his 1779 book "Epochs of Nature" he proposed that the earth was formed from solar material ripped from the Earth by a passing comet. As time passed it became apparent that there are difficulties with this theory on all levels. It does not explain the origin of the sun, of the comet, or of other solar system bodies. It does not explain why stars and planets rotate, or why planetary orbits are roughly circular. The mass of any conceivable comet is too low to tear material from the sun. Passage of a massive body through the solar system would disrupt the circular orbits of the planets, etc.

Collision Hypothesis

A theory set forth by French naturalist Georges Buffon in 1779 that the earth was created by material torn from the sun by a passing comet. The theory did not address the origin of the sun, of the comet, or of the other planets. It is now known that comets lack the mass tear material from the sun, and that any body massive enough to do so would create a hideously complex dynamics problem that is probably not resolvable with today's tools and knowledge.

Nebular Hypothesis

The theory that planets coalesced along with stars from rotating gas clouds. This is essentially the modern theory of planetary creation although the early advocates were unaware of many things that both support and conflict with the nebular hypothesis.

The theory is most commonly associated with Immanual Kant who proposed it in 1755. Kant envisioned a rotating cloud of gas that contracted and flattened into a disk within which the planets coalesced. The theory explains why the planets rotate around the sun and why they spin. The theory was set forth in a book called "Universal Natural History and the Theory of the Heavens: An essay on the Constitution and Mechanical Origin of the Whole Universe According to Newton's Principles." The publisher went bankrupt and the book was more or less unknown for many years. A significant portion was published with Kant's permission in the 1791. The work did not become widely known until the mid 19th Century, Kant apparently based his work on books by Thomas Wright , Emmanuel Swedenborg, and Rene Descartes.

Immanuel Kant

An 18th Century philosopher who is credited with originating the Nebular Theory of Earth's Creation. Kant was born in 1722 and died in the 1790s. He was best known in his lifetime for his philosophy. A book setting forth the Nebular theory was written in 1755, but was not published due to the bankrupcy of the publisher. Portions were printed with Kant's permission in 1791. Kant is best known for his work "A Critique of Pure Reason" in which he argued that many topics are not capable of anaylsis by reason alone.

Kant's nebular hypothesis seems to have been based on the prior work of Descartes, Thomas Wright and Emmanuel Swedenborg. Kant was unaware of some theoretical difficulties including the fact that gravitation can not cause rotation and the fact that compaction of gasses would not create solid elements. However, he did clean up some of the prior work and introduced some interesting concepts including repulsive forces as well as attractive ones.



Isaac Newton

A famous seventeenth Century philosopher and mathematician who set forth the laws of planetary motion and hypothesized the force called gravity. Ironically, Newton was adamently opposed to the "Cartesian Hypothesis" of his contemporary Rene Descartes which appears to have accurately identified the origin of stars and didn't do badly with the origin of the planets.

Cartesian Hypothesis

A concept set forth by Rene Descartes in 1655 that planets coalesed from comets which evolved from stars which evolved from swirling vortices of gas created by God. Decartes was prolific and this is only one of a number of "Cartesian Hypotheses" in various fields.

Rene Descartes

A seventeenth Century French mathematician and Philosopher born in 1596 and died in 1650. He is regarded as the father or modern philosophy. He proposed in a 1644 book called "Principles of Philosophy" that God had created and set adrift a number of vortices of swirling gas that eventually condensed into stars. Descartes thought that stars evolved into comets which in turn became planets. His contemporary Newton felt that the "Cartesian Hypothesis" was totally wrong headed.





Emmanuel Swedenborg

An 18th Century cleric who is best known for founding a small church called the church of New Jeruselem. In 1734 he wrote a book called the "Principia" in which he hypothesized that a rapidly rotating nebula formed itself into the Solar System. Although this is remarkably close to modern beliefs, Swedenborg's credibility was harmed somewhat by his admission that the theory reflects information given to him from heavenly sources during seances. Some of his contemporaries thought that his spiritual communicants might be devils rather than angels. It is assumed that Swedenborg's hypothesis influenced Kant when he laid out his Nebular Hypothesis 20 years later.

Pierre Simon LaPlace

An 18th Century astronomer and mathematician who published a book called Expositon du System du Monde in 1796. LaPlace expanded on the nebular hypothesis of Swedenborg and Kant and hypothesized that as nebulae contracted, they flattened and rotated faster eventually spinning off subnebulae that condensed into planets. LaPlace demonstrated that the laws of Gravity and Conservation of Angular Momentum would support this mode of planetary formation. One of the two major problems with this theory is that 99% of the mass in the solar system is in the sun whereas almost all the rotational energy is in the the planets. It is very hard to explain how this could happen under the influence only of gravity. The second is that of explaining how the subnebulae with their limited mass could manage to hold themselves together and form planets rather than disintigrating into expanding gas clouds,



Fred Whipple

A 20th Century astronomer who hypothesized that the sun, planets, and comets condensed from cold material agglomerated from dust clouds under pressure of starlight. The obvious problem with this hypothesis is where the original stars whose light pushed things together came from. However, Whipple's description of comets as "dirty snowballs" seems accurate.

Gerald P Kuiper

A mid 20th Century astronomer who proposed yet another version of the nebular theory called the "protoplanet theory" of solar and planetary creation. In Kuiper's hypothesis, a cloud of gas formed and contracted into a sun as a result of a chance eddy in the gas. The sun forming in the center of the cloud heated the remainder of the cloud.

The theory does not account for sufficient gravitational attraction to pull tenuous gas clouds into stars and does not account for the rotation of planets and moons. It seems to require a very large number of "chance eddies" \ one per star.

Carl von Weizsacker

A mid 20th Century astronomer who ressurected the nebular hypothesis of LaPlace, Kant, et al. Weizsacker started with LaPlace's nebular theory, but instead of spinning planets off of the rim, he hypothesized that the center of the nebula collapsed into the sun leaving the rotating outer layers. The Sun is then hypothecated to have sent out blasts of energy creating turbulence in the outer ring. This transferred angular momentum from the sun to the rotating outer nebula which then collapsed into planets and moons. This theory solved both the issue of how so much rotational energy ended up in the planets and of why the planets did not disperse into clouds of gas as they no longer had to be spun off from the rotating nebula. It does not fully explain why all the planetary orbits lie in a plane, why the orbits are exponentially spaced. or why all the planets from Saturn inward rotate counterclockwise when viewed from "above"..





Thomas Wright

An obscure English philosopher why wrote a book called "An Original Theory of the Universe" In which he argued that the solar system itself rotated around some center of rotation and the the universe had many systems of stars rotating around individual center of rotations (what we would now call Galaxies). Wright's ideas contributed to Kant's Nebular Model of Creation.

http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/02-star8.htm

Above reference has links to lots of information on solar creation models

Oxygen Isotope Ratios

A analysis of the ratio of O16 \ the most common isotope \ to O17 and O18. Oxygen Isotope Ratios for (assumed) primitive inclusions in asteroids are 3.65 to 3.75 *10^4 for O17 and .00195 to .00198 for O18. Asteroid materials are clustered into three groups around 3.8 and .00201; 3,83 and .202; and 3.85 and .00204. Earth, Mars and Lunar ratios are in the general range of the middle group of asteroid material. Oxygen ratios for the sun are poorly known. Oxygen isotope ratio variations are much larger than isotope ratio variations for other materials for unknown reasons.



http://www.kheper.auz.com/gaia/Paleozoic/Cambrian/Tommotian/tomm1.htm


Anamalocaris canadiensis Laggania Cambria



Shallow water sandstones and carbonates rocks of mid Proterozoic (1.4Ga) age in Northeastern Idaho, NorthWestern Montana and British Columbia. Stromatolites have been recognized there for a century. Microfossils have been identified as carbonaceous ribbons up to 12cm in length and 2mm wide. Other carbonaceous objects include lanceolate forms, coiled forms, curved ribbons and branched filaments.




Beltanella

The Chuar consists of three formations; the Galeros formation (shale, limestone, sandstone); the Kwangunt formation (shale with minor limestone and sandstone; and the Sixtymile Sandstone (oldest).

Melanocyrillium

A vase shaped fossil from the upper 300m of the Neoproterozoic Chuar Group in the Grand Canyon..

Big Cottonwood Group

A Late neoproterozoic sequence from the Wastach Mountains East of Salt Lake City

Parhump Group

A neoproterozoic formation contemporaneous with the Chuar Group of the Grand Canyon and the Unita Mountain Group of Northern Utah

Uinta Mountain Group

A neoproterozoic formation contemporaneous with the Chuar Group of the Grand Canyon and Pahrump Group.

Sixtymile Formation

The Oldest Member of the Neoproterozoic Chuar Group in the Grand Canyon. Primarily tan sandstone with minor shaly beds.

Kwagunt Formation

The middle member of the Neoproterozoic Chuar Group in the Grand Canyon. Primarily black shale and red to purple siltstone with minor limestone and with reddish sandstone in the Carbon Butte area. Stromatolites are found in the formation.

Galeros Formation

The Youngest member of the Neoproterozoic Chuar Group in the Grand Canyon. Interbedded greenish and red shales, sandstones and limestones with some fossil stromatolites.